Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:142.227.150.1/Archive 1

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. No consensus to delete. Talk pages and talk page archives are rarely ever deleted except for very good reason. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:59, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

User talk:142.227.150.1/Archive 1


Pointless archiving of old IP talk page warnings. (Have not tagged the pages with the MfD tag, because don't see any point of doing that, considering that these are unlikely to have any watchers.) SD0001 (talk) 19:02, 12 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete useless. I'm surprised you found these all. Legacypac (talk) 19:40, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not pointless.  Not useless.  Not hard to find.  Careless deletions are a way bigger problem than leaving these live.  Archiving is a very good idea to not confuse new users of the IP, and the archive is a good explanation for the reception are newcomer on an old IP may receive.  If you want to change policy, address WP:OLDIP.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:27, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * You may find the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 33 from 2009 useful. It was a discussion about making a speedy deletion criterion to delete old talk pages. However, some of the IPs in the list above are actually currently blocked right now and the deletion of these archive pages is against WP:OLDIP so the answer to this MfD nomination is to keep. I am sure there are IP talk page archives which are much more useless than this that don't have any warnings. They are useful. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:58, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:OLDIP only says that user talk pages themselves should not be deleted if the IPs are blocked. Neither OLPIP nor the 2009 discussion you linked says anything about deletion of archived IP talk pages. There is broad, though undocumented, community consensus against archiving of warnings on IP talk pages, which is clearly reflected in the fact that OW (Older warnings have been removed) has 475,000 transclusions against a mere 77 for Warning archive notice (which is used on parent pages of all above pages). SD0001 (talk) 14:05, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.