Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:163.150.225.201/Archive 1

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - Not intended to be a ruling on every such page, but there is no apparent use here, history archive as mentioned below is sufficient. — xaosflux  Talk 15:38, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

User talk:163.150.225.201/Archive 1


Pointless archiving of old IP talk warnings. The usually followed practice is to just remove old warnings and add OW template to the talk page. SD0001 (talk) 08:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Maybe one of the vandals who has used the address is planning to make word salad out of the warnings. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Therefore Delete Robert McClenon (talk) 17:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. IP usertalk pages should be archived in the talk page history. Don’t create live archives without a reason. They are meaningless to confusing and scary when the IP moves to unrelated people. Is it a long term fixed IP? —SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:12, 8 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.