Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:2601:680:CA01:5A30:8454:8987:AB05:A725

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. ‑Scottywong | [converse] || 06:44, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

User talk:2601:680:CA01:5A30:8454:8987:AB05:A725

 * – (View MfD)

This warning is incorrect, but that's all the page has as content. Firestar464 (talk) 02:58, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - Other editors have presented better arguments about not deleting things that we don't understand, or that we do understand and don't do any harm. However, there is no reason to delete the talk pages of IP addresses.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:40, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - If the nominator's statement is correct, then G6 is appropriate. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 02:40, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per Godsy. Firestar464 (talk) 10:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, the nominator's statement is somewhat misleading (not intentionally, obviously). The warning was given by ClueBot for an edit that the bot thought was problematic. Arguably the bot was in error to revert, but it still reverted the edit, so it makes no sense to delete the bot's message about it. If the nominator thought it was that problematic, blank the page! &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:46, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.