Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:94.23.201.171

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:18, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

User talk:94.23.201.171


Not sure why this page exists with the block message. This IP user doesn't appear to have ever done even one edit let alone one to get them blocked. This tells me it happened so many years ago that it predatres Wikipedias capability to track the edit history. Kumioko (talk) 11:04, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - this is a discussion very much in progress pertaining directly to the block on the IP in question. Yes it is blocked. There is no need to delete the discussion, even when it concludes, as it will likely remain relevant for some time. Thanks for closing this early. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:15, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm curious as to why they would block an IP and then discuss it when that IP appears to have never edited. --Kumioko (talk) 11:19, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * It was pre-emptively range-blocked, and now the 'owner' would like to use it. I have verified both, and if you read the discussion in progress you would realise that, for example, one option is to softblock it directly causing an entry in its block log. Another option is that it might suddenly start editing like a bot. You'd appreciate the ability to read the background to it if that happened. True the same discussion could have been started elsewhere, but it didn't. And now that it has, it's going to remain relevant for some time yet. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:26, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete This has to be the first time I've ever seen someone nominate an IP talk page for deletion. Delete as an implementation of the spirit of speedy deletion criterion U2 (nonexistent user) — this user has never made any edits, so it shouldn't have a userpage for any purpose.  As we know that the "owner" wants to use the account for legitimate purposes, we shouldn't worry about misuse of this IP address.  Nyttend (talk) 04:04, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Per zzuuzz, don't see any reason to delete a legitimate IP talk page being used for that purpose. Crazynast 18:34, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per Nyttend. - F ASTILY  (TALK) 06:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - @"no edits" -> "I request the IP to be unblocked (it is static) so the scripts running on there may resume their tasks. - " Bulwersator (talk) 14:39, 16 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.