Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:A.S.M.Kamrul Huda, MBBS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Delete Spartaz Humbug! 05:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

User talk:A.S.M.Kamrul Huda, MBBS
User talk page detailing only the contents of what could be a confidential letter ESpublic013 (talk) 22:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Weird. Move to sandbox, blank, and ask user what he is doing.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:58, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly a letter to an editor of a scientific journal of some sort -- such letters are submitted for publication, hence not "confidential."  Collect (talk) 13:41, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * What does this have to do with Wikipedia? OutOfTimer (talk) 14:20, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no requirement that material in userapace be encyclopedic. This is not spam, commerical, nonsense, hoax etc. It is not "confidential" (reason proffered for deletion). Absent a solid reason to delete, I default to Keep. Collect (talk) 14:39, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Content in userspace should be related to the encyclopedia in some way. It doesn't have to actually cause harm to be deleted... WP:NOHARM and such. Gigs (talk) 14:48, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Not per WP:USER. I checked all 15 enumerated sentences about what not to have - it hits none of them, nor does it hit any other reson to delete. It appears to convey an opinion which is not "Extensive personal opinions " which appears to be the claim. Collect (talk) 14:02, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Those 15 things are examples of what is unacceptable. It is by no means an exhaustive list.  Gigs (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a free web host. In addition, we have no idea where this letter comes from. How do you know it's his and not stolen from the net or anywhere else? OutOfTimer (talk) 14:20, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a free web host. MER-C 03:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment (and, as nominator, I suppose this is automatically a Delete) he came on Wikipedia with two accounts just to do the same thing: write his opinion on whatever medicine subject he's talking about. He has made no contributions to the encyclopedia, and the talk page contents in no way "draw[s] the attention or discuss the edits of a user...directed solely toward the improvement of the site." —Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!)What I Do / What I Say 14:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. User does not seem interested in building an encyclopaedia, so WP:WEBHOST applies. Firestorm  Talk 01:43, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.