Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Acidburn24m/Archive 1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete U1. The only time user talk pages can't be deleted is if they contain the history of the comments; that isn't the case in this situation, as the history is at the main talk page. Given archiving comments is optional, the logical next step is to assume that they can be deleted if they don't include the history of the original comments. Daniel (talk) 00:58, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Acidburn24m/Archive 1
I am retiring from Wikipedia for good


 * Delete - Archive page for a retiring editor. Tatarian (talk) 17:40, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Blank as a courtesy. Delete only if there is some really good reason, to preserve old discussions on topics --Enric Naval (talk) 01:32, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Blank, don't delete. Generally, we shouldn't delete talk archives unless there's a truly pressing need to do so. Blanking (and optionally protecting the archive as blank) seems like enough in this case. — Gavia immer (talk) 13:43, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The comments will still be in his talkpages history. Why keep 2 different pages to preserve the exact same information? Tatarian (talk) 14:17, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.