Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Adam mugliston/Rcsprinter123

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep - I'm done with this, Not only is this wasting everyones time but it's also achieving fuck all, So gonna wrap this up and hopefully we can forget this mess ever happened and move on, Trout for me for reopening!. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

User talk:Adam mugliston/Rcsprinter123


Not entirely sure if this is U5 material but it's basically some bus discussion between and  - Don't really see the point in keeping this around anymore – Davey 2010 Talk 20:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as dead wood. The page hadn't been edited in more than four years. --MelanieN (talk) 20:19, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. No good reason to interfere with other's userspace.  Using userspace for Wikipedian interaction is perfectly reasonable.  What is with the sudden harassment of ?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, keep due to being a talk page. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:49, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * None of this is relevant here, and it's not harassment in the slightest..... – Davey 2010 Talk 07:57, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I originally closed as Withdrawn/Blank but surprise surprise Mr Sprinter has an issue so instead of edit warring I've just reopened this. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:50, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The beauty of blanking is that the author can unblank when they return and assert a purpose to the page. The authors here are clearly active.  You are being provocative.  This should be closed from MfD and sent to WP:DR.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:51, 14 October 2015 (UTC)


 * You can't close this as anything other than withdrawn because you are WP:INVOLVED. Therefore, there is no consensus to blank and you shouldn't stick your oar into the page.  Rcsprinter123    (drone)  19:54, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The consensus on other MFDs was to blank and instead of having arguements everywhere the logical thing to do was to blank them and if anyone came back and reverted then cool, You reverted both edits to make a WP:POINT which is just pointless! (Had you reverted just yours and worked it I wouldn't have had an issue!), You have no reason to fuck about with someone elses userspace anyway.... If Adam wanted to revert and work on it then it's up to him not you!. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:58, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * You can't expect some "other MFDs" which I am not involved in to make some kind of consensus for this one, then accuse me of making a POINT when I give a valid reason why the page shouldn't be blanked. Adam has informed me that he would like this page to remain, so I am not "fuck[ing] about with someone elses userspace". Please be civil, find a proper consensus for each MfD, then we can work to a solution for the page. That an administrator will agree to.  Rcsprinter123    (natter)  20:07, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * It would've been pointless for the editor to !vote on every single AFD stating "Blank" - It was more or less the preferred outcome so applying it to all of them was the easiest and less-disruptive thing to do...., If Adam wanted it unblanked I am sure he is capable of doing it himself, As I said consensus was more or less to simply blank .... But whatever we're here now... – Davey 2010 Talk 20:19, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * There is no "all of them". Each MfD is separate. Blanking without clear consensus for EVERY affected page IS disruptive. Now, why not just withdraw this MfD again, and the page can continue existing.  Rcsprinter123    (confess)  20:21, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I disagree entirely, The Blanking was much less disruptive but we're gonna be here all night so we'll agree to disagree, Because the page is irrelevant but no point screwing around opening & closing everything so we'll let both run there course, If an admin disagrees with me on this then I'll have to live with that, – Davey 2010 Talk 20:26, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Has it not crossed your mind that I have a life outside of here? I can see very clearly that you don't, but I do. Therefore, I asked Rcsprinter to revert, since it was a page he was heavily involved in. "More or less the preffered outcome"?! There was a delete !vote and a keep !vote, hardly the preferred outcome. Now, keep your nose out of my userspace and mind your own business. Adam Mugliston  talk  21:00, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I assume you haven't read any of the above?....., Anyway technically it's not yours - anyone can nominate any page they like me included!, If you don't want your pages nominated or deleted then the obvious solution is don't create pages .... Look no point arguing so as I said we'll agree to disagree. – Davey 2010 Talk 21:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is not the slightest bit close to being U5 material.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:53, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.