Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:AdmiralAlex

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete Will provide an export by email upon request, user may be able to migrate elsewhere such as wikia. — xaosflux  Talk 03:50, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

User talk:AdmiralAlex


Not an appropriate use of a User talk page, or even of a User page DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 23:33, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

What I do on my user and user talk page are none of anyone else's business. I have maintained that page with meticulous detail for greater than 1 year now, and I will not have some bastard take it down! It is my page, MY PAGE, so leave it alone! AdmiralAlex (talk) 21:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * As per WP:NOTWEBHOST, Wikipedia is not Facebook or any other webhosting service. Your talk page looks nothing like a normal User talk page and even if you moved it to your main User page it would still not be appropriate. You do not own your user pages. DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 22:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per WP:NOTWEBHOST. Wikipedia talk pages are not meant to be a Facebook/blog service nor are they owned by the user. Recommend that user saves his work and hosts it elsewhere. CommanderLinx (talk) 05:27, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Move to user page. It's an inappropriate use of a talk page but a plausible user page. Editor has a few edits to the encyclopedia so I'm not sure we're at the WP:NOTHERE stage yet. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:54, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment IMO there appears to be very little, if any, content on this page that passes WP:USERPAGE, the vast majority seems to be a clear violation of WP:USERBIO. DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 03:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as WP:NOTWEBHOST. This page would be no more suitable as a user page than a user talk page and so should be deleted. Ca2james (talk) 16:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Blanking is enough As this is a user talk page. If the user reverts, we can have him blocked! SD0001 (talk) 15:54, 26 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.