Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Aileenb




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. harej 00:09, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Aileenb
Editor's only activity on Wikipedia has been to write this polemical essay on her user talk page, which ends with an advertisement for novoicenochoice.co.uk. Suggest delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST. Psychonaut (talk) 14:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, the only POV essays permitted on Wikipedia are ones advocating a way in which we should edit Wikipedia. This is totally unrelated to the scope of the encyclopedia, and thus falls under WP:NOTWEBHOST as suggested by the nominator.  Nyttend (talk) 00:53, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Does not belong on the talk page in any case. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:07, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST. Peacock (talk) 21:37, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST.  JBsupreme  ( talk ) 21:43, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a soapbox: Advocacy, propaganda, or recruitment of any kind: commercial, political, religious, or otherwise is not permitted, and this is quite obviously some kind of advocacy! JulieSpaulding (talk) 06:14, 31 January 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.