Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Alexxxthebest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete as vandalism bd2412  T 06:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Alexxxthebest
User's sole contribution is the few lines on this page which manage to cram in an amazing amount of vulgar imagery in a short space. -- bd2412  T 04:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I think this one can be speedied, G3. WODUP  06:01, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm hesitant to speedy a userpage, but if there ever was a case for it, this would be it. No objection if someone else wants to go ahead and do so. bd2412  T 06:33, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete userpage and then replace talk page with a block template obviously not here to build an encyclopedia. Icewedge (talk) 06:36, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Not sure blockage is necessary. User made two edits, seven months ago, and never came back. bd2412  T 06:39, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * [edit conflict]Oh, didn't see that. I just assumed it would be a recent catch by the recent changes patrol, just delete then I guess. Icewedge (talk) 06:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, in light of the discussion, I've just gone and speedied both the userpage and user talk. Nothing there that could conceivably be kept anyway. bd2412  T 06:41, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.