Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Anglethrice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was delete. &mdash;harej (talk) (cool!) 00:55, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Anglethrice
Talk page of indefinitely blocked user, CAT:TEMP. Two admins have declined my speedy request (see the discussion here), which is supported by the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 34, so I have brought it here to see what the community thinks. Cunard (talk) 17:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, I would speedy this but it's already been declined twice so I'd rather not overturn the decisions unilaterally. It's run-of-the-mill childish vandalism, and standard warnings of which we don't need to keep a record. Had the blocking admin used the standard indef block template, it would have been placed into Category:Temporary Wikipedian userpages and eventually deleted by an automated process. (Perhaps in future you could just add the cat if you can't find an admin who knows about CAT:TEMP). –xenotalk 13:11, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.