Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Anonymous Lady7

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete, then restore all but the first, political rant, version. JohnCD (talk) 19:32, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

User talk:Anonymous Lady7


User talk pages are not meant for political propaganda. Stefan2 (talk) 12:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and Block. Blatant NOTADVOCACY violation, obvious sole intention, page not yet used as talk except for warnings. Maybe blank and block is better. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete without block is not ok because the warnings will be lost. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a soapbox. -- Whpq (talk) 16:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not acceptable at all. SwisterTwister   talk  06:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Blank. We don't delete user talk pages. If someone really wants, an admin could (I would at least) delete the first edit from the history as a U5 and restore it without that one version. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:59, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep and keep contribution blanked per WP:DELTALK; nothing so grossly offensive etc that RevDel is needed. Unless there is something in the user's deleted contributions that I can't view, blocking seems like overkill as well. VQuakr (talk) 07:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.