Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Betacommand/Sandbox 4


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Withdrawn Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:22, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Betacommand/Sandbox 4
not a talk page for User:Betacommand/Sandbox 4. Appears to be a copy of WP:AN to preserve a conversation about fair use images. Problem is that it looks exactly like WP:AN, and places itself into actual project categories. Not edited since January, this could be confusing and certainly shouldn't be using project categories and templates. This is what talk page archives are for. -- ~  JohnnyMrNinja  08:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Inquiry Did you, oh, I don't know, maybe ask Betacommand about this page before bringing it here? Hi DrNick ! 12:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep absurd. We can easily fix the categories without deletion. Also, next time go to the user first. -- Ned Scott 04:57, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn - Sorry, this was a lot more rude than I thought it would be. I was very tired, and figured that since I was going to be gone for a few days, it would be simpler to let the process handle this than to leave a message that I'd forget about. Don't know why this made sense to me, but it certainly doesn't any more. Sorry, Betacommand. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  06:16, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Meh, it happens :) -- Ned Scott 09:41, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.