Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Bijay Ketan Swain

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Snowkeep. I removed the two paragraphs at the top (but without a comment on the page - unnecessary in my view). Deleting the page, which is unjustified anyway, would lose all the history of everyone's posts. Bbb23 (talk) 21:22, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

User talk:Bijay Ketan Swain


User talk pages cannot look like actual pages UNSC Luke 1021 (talk) 17:40, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * User:UNSC Luke 1021: Perhaps withdraw your nomination? The user page was deleted, and the TP is insufficiently like an article, as it stands, in any case. Save time further along, this case sitting here. &mdash;  O Fortuna!   Imperatrix mundi.  20:42, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Just blank the first two paragraphs on the top of the page about Bijay Ketan Swain, and provide an explanation on that same talk page why this was done. This will preserve the remaining content on the talk page that does not fall into WP:FAKEARTICLE territory. North America1000 20:39, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.