Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Cactoblastoff

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:28, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

User:Cactoblastoff/Temp


Please delete as a fake article. I welcomed the editor and asked them why there were working on it here. There was no response, and they removed my remarks. Editor has made four edits to the real article; I have not checked to see (nor will I) if those edits completely transfer the work that was done in user space. Drmies (talk) 16:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE. I have moved the page to User:Cactoblastoff/Temp to separate it from the user talk page. Cunard (talk) 23:21, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete asside from the point above, it is a copy/paste of an existing article with no attribution to previous authors.--kelapstick(bainuu) 23:27, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unhelpful (copyright menacing) fork of Cactoblastis cactorum.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:35, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.