Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Essam Bakhashwein

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  keep. I've removed the social networking stuff again, this should be monitored. MER-C 10:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

User talk:Essam Bakhashwein


WP:FAKEARTICLE on user talk page -- samtar whisper 16:32, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Revision delete the offending versions, but keep the page overall to maintain a history of warnings. —C.Fred (talk) 17:56, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete any unnecessary details as such but it's worth noting this is certainly not an outstanding deletion priority at all. SwisterTwister   talk  07:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep   Per WP:UPYES a user can have something in their about themselves, which he (I'm assuming ) does, further experimentation and  limited biographical content is allowed.  His content does not contain any of the items dissallowed in WP:UP#NOT  ( divisive, racial, inflamatory content, nor does is contain any advocacy...etc.... ).   Further he has less content on his userpage than either Samtar or C.Fred, additionally, I see Sister Twister has advocacy material on his main page about a cricket strategy game, unless you're planning to trim or delete those pages also, then by all means, leave his page and close this up as being totally ridiculous.  Kosh Vorlon   12:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Before jumping straight in and not bothering to check, please see the version of the page before the user removed the clear WP:FAKEARTICLE. By all means close this as no action now. Just for future discussions, there's a nice way of pointing something out, and then there's this which only serves to be difficult and doesn't lend itself to a CIVIL discussion does it? I'm getting a little sick of unwarranted incivility -- samtar whisper 12:32, 29 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep No downright objectionable content on this user talk page. Revision deletion would only mess up things. 103.6.159.73 (talk) 12:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. The inappropriate content has been removed and there are genuine user talk page messages there - and we should not delete user talk pages with genuine content. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:45, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep We do not delete user talk pages without very good reason. This could have been handled by simply moving the material to their user page and leaving a note such as to explain what they did wrong. Lots of new users make this mistake.  J bh  Talk  13:59, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - According to WP:OSFAQ:
 * Q: Do you suppress personal information posted by editors under eighteen?
 * A: Yes, though oversighter discretion will apply to the specifics of any individual case. Though the English Wikipedia is not bound by the American Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, which causes many websites to bar users under thirteen, we do take the safety and privacy of minors, both over thirteen and under, quite seriously. If you have encountered a young editor providing too much personal information on Wikipedia, please contact the Oversight team so we can evaluate the situation.
 * The page history of this user talk page includes personal information of an editor who is yet to turn 18. Rev-del or Oversight would seem to be needed.  I will send a message to the oversight time requesting comment.  EdChem (talk) 14:31, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.