Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Euclidthegreek

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep. Deletion of formerly active user talk pages is deprecated and no unusual justification has been provided. --RL0919 (talk) 23:27, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Euclidthegreek


Blanked talk page. Taking to MfD as CSD interpratation was why it was it was seemingly blanked. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:00, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Strong oppose - WTF no. -- J (t)  16:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep this is a [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=renameuser&user=MBisanz&page=User%3AEuclidthegreek&year=&month=-1&tagfilter= user] who has been renamed after SPI incidents in the past and, as far as I can tell, is very keen on dissociating themselves from their previous accounts and making a [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Double_sharp&diff=prev&oldid=461400458 clean start]. They initially tried to get their user talk page [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEuclidthegreek&action=historysubmit&diff=465112674&oldid=464274685 speedied], but I declined it. Whilst I do think the user was sincere in trying to make a clean start (at time of writing they have a clean post-rename block log, note), their somewhat odd behaviour (like [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Euclidthegreek&diff=next&oldid=465115808 undoing] my CSD-tag removal and having a habit of blanking their user talk page rather than archiving it) does concern me. Overall, I feel that (a) the presence of this old UT page should not impede the now reformed user from being good on the Wiki and (b) given their slightly concerning pattern of behaviour as outlined above, it is worth keeping these records in case something does come up in the future.  It Is Me Here   t / c 09:58, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * It doesn't really matter to me. Double sharp (talk) 07:59, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Normally, we do not delete user talk pages, as it is sometimes necessary to check the history of transactions there. (This is particularly true in the case of a user with a problematic history, but can apply to any user.) No special; reason has been given for making an exception in this case. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:55, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.