Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:GiantBluePanda

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Per Dennis Brown, as the user has been blocked indefinitely as a disruptive sock, making the rationale for deletion moot. Newyorkbrad (talk) 17:18, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

User talk:GiantBluePanda


Having long discussion of blocking and unblocking ; which was for a false block. It becomes irritating always, when you discuss something on-wiki with a user and he/she asks "Oh, You were blocked and unblocked for a WP:CLEANSTART. What Is your previous user name, Was curious about it." So, The page is useless for me and for another editor. Also, a little bit of misguiding it is. GiantBluePanda (talk) 07:12, 12 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per WP:UP, user talk pages are generally not deleted; they are usually needed for reference by other users. I don't see anything in the talk page history that would be needed for reference by other users relative to GiantBluePanda. GiantBluePanda would like to make a clean start from a prior non-blocked user account and there's no reason to keep this user talk history. You should also try Oversight and Criteria_for_redaction to delete the talk page and this MfD discussion. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 07:52, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I think you got a misunderstanding. I don't want to do a clean start. Instead, this account is clean start of my previous account. GiantBluePanda (talk) 07:58, 12 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete As per Panda ;)  TheStrike  Σagle   09:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * keep Talk page deletions are rare for a reason. Anything can be revdel'ed if needed (oversight is not needed at all), but I don't see anything that is outing or a problem here, and nothing that needs hiding from admins.  Deleting in this circumstance seems to be outside the very limited circumstances we allow talk pages to be deleted under.  A look at this users contribs isn't reassuring either, nor their current input at ANI.  The ANI discussion itself demonstrates why it is important to NOT delete talk pages.  Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 12:56, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep; no solid reason for deletion. Did you know that you're allowed to delete expired block notices from your talk page?  Nyttend (talk) 13:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Now moot as I've indef blocked the editor as a sock. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 15:11, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.