Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Iantresman/pu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Core desat 02:59, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Iantresman/pu
This page is a creation of deleted content by a banned user. Nondistinguished 14:56, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Also nominating User:Iantresman/monobook.js. --  Jreferee  (Talk) 05:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Neutral This page is a bit weird... It's not possible for that user to create that page ever again, as he's been indef banned. That said, it IS like a sandbox, sort of, because many users create articles in their sandboxes before actually putting them in mainspace. That said, I remain neutral. GrooveDog (talk) (Review) 20:00, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral I agree, it is a sandbox, he just can't use it. Yamakiri on Firefox 23:56, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all - Per Wikipedia:Userpage, edits from banned users may be removed. This is normally done when they are banned. Also, disallowed use #3 includes archives of content that is meant to be part of the encyclopedia. --  Jreferee  (Talk) 05:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all they are unnecessary subpages. Acalamari 17:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.