Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Ilyushka88/February 2007

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy Delete - as these are copies of the talk page, not the original contributions - the original contributions are still in the user talk history. — xaosflux  Talk 02:39, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

User talk:Ilyushka88/February 2007


Non needed Archive pages of user talk, since I changed to use simplier "archive 1", "archive 2" etc... method. Contents have been copied to newer archive pages. Ilyushka88 &#124; Talk! Contribs 18:46, 21 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete all per WP:CSD. User:Metropolitan90 was correct to note that the requested WP:CSD doesn't apply to the User_talk namespace, but he failed to note that these are all just copy-paste-archives for which the user is the sole author, and are therefore speediable under the G7 criterion.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:36, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all. It's unclear to me that WP:CSD applies to user talk archive pages, because the "substantial content of the page" was not all created by User:Ilyushka88; it was created by other users responding on User talk:Ilyushka88. Nevertheless, I am supporting deletion because I understand that Ilyushka has copied the content of the monthly archive pages to numbered archive pages. I had removed speedy tags from a bunch of the monthly pages, but I stopped once I realized that Ilyushka had switched to using the numbered archive pages. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:09, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I note that users are allowed to blank their talk pages without archiving. I think it follows that they may archive and then delete their archives, as long as no other users talk edits are deleted.
 * Personally, I find talk page blankers and talk page move-archivers to be borderline disruptive, and only slightly less so users who never archive eventually rendering their talk page inaccessible.
 * My wish is that all accounts should have basic automated archival set up by default on account creation. Here, "minthreadsleft = 4" especially, is an example of suitable default parameters.  This is alongside auto-welcoming.
 * Not sure where to best say this. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:49, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * SmokeyJoe, that is an awesome idea in my opinion. Although I am not sure how much that might load the bots. It might be the problem. Ilyushka88 &#124; Talk! Contribs 21:35, 22 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment as you can see here, the archive nav box was quite a mess and had loads of red links since I've had longer pauses from editing Wikipedia. That's why I decided to use numbered archive pages instead. It should simplify everything. Ilyushka88 &#124; Talk! Contribs 23:08, 22 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.