Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:JAQ/Zoophilia

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

User talk:JAQ/Zoophilia

 * – (View MfD)

Zoophilia was a popular editing subject in the early days of Wikipedia and I've come across several sandboxes that focus on discussing the specifics of this article. The editors are no longer editing so I'm going to be nominating them for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:43, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I thought this would fall under "Problematic userspace material" but I guess I'm in the minority here. Liz Read! Talk! 18:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep, No stated rationale other than "being old", which isn't a cause for deletion. —  csc -1 06:12, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. No reason for deletion. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:27, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per prior. Genuine problematic userspace material is pretty uncommon, and far more immediately recognizable than something like this -- think attack pages. Most of them are also speedy-eligible, so there's relatively little that's worth MfDing. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 19:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep per CSC et al - Bordering on useless sure but on the other hand it's not an attack page and isn't causing anyone any harm. I concur with CSC being old isn't a reason to delete something. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - Just because a userspace page contains drafting content or notes on a topic that some may find distasteful is not a reason to delete it over that of any other userspace sandbox or subpage. Wikipedia is not censored. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 07:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I generally support a pretty high bar for deleting userspace content - this certainly isn't doing any harm staying around. Elliot321 (talk &#124; contribs) 04:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - no basis for deletion presented or apparent. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.