Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Jim Apple/deeceevoice departure


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy deleted by SCZenz. Tito xd (?!? - help us) 06:40, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

User talk:Jim Apple/deeceevoice departure
It is highly unorthodox for userspace pages to be listed for deletion, but I don't feel there is any other option in this case. This page rises dangerously close to the level of a personal attack, and is certainly inappropriate for any namespace on Wikipedia. It is bad enough that so much discord has sorrounded the RfAr of deeceevoice, but to actually have a betting pool on when her last day will be is completely beyond what any Wikipedian should be doing. I was tempted to speedy the page and issue a disruption block to the creator, but instead assumed good faith and gave him the opportunity to request its deletion himself. He has opted not to do so, and thus I am listing it here, and raising the issue at AN/I to consider a block. I hope the community will put a quick end to the latest chapter of an already disasterous situation. DELETE WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. — Essjay  ·   Talk 06:17, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I've tagged this for speedy deletion as "Well, just a really bad idea." Someone please delete it and take it straight to WP:DRV or WP:ANI. -  brenneman (t) (c)  06:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * There is no betting, so there is no betting pool. I also think that there is nothing derisive about dcv on the page. (as of now.) I never call her a name or say she's a bad editor or a bad person. Jim Apple 06:23, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Amounts to a personal attack. -Will Beback 06:32, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * dcv even said "Talk about it somewhere else". I just set up a place for it!
 * I have speedy deleted the page. It's an attack and a disruption. -- SCZenz 06:37, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The page was recreated immediately after the deletion (my guess is that it was an edit conflict, not a deliberate recreation) so I have re-speedied it to maintain SCZenz's speedy. — Essjay  ·   Talk 06:42, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.