Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Martinphi/diffs1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Greeves (talk • contribs) 04:53, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Martinphi/diffs1
Reason attack page &#0149;Jim 62 sch&#0149;  22:50, 22 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete This is simply a continuation of attacks by this editor on User:ScienceApologist. This is offensive. Orange Marlin  Talk• Contributions 23:08, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Speedy under which criteria? CSD G10? —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 23:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Must be kept Not an attack page, but part of the evidence of the previous ArbCom. Thus, it must be kept.  Look at the "What links here."  Otherwise, it could be deleted. Please consider, for the sake of politeness if nothing else, informing people when pages they have in their user space or or have recently heavily edited are being considered for deletion.  If deleted, I will request undeletion on grounds that it is part of the history of the ArbCom case. —— Martinphi    ☎ Ψ Φ —— 01:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment If you really need to keep it, why not remove the link from your user page?  &#0149;Jim 62 sch&#0149;  11:32, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep It's not an attack to simply list a bunch of diffs, especially if it was used as evidence. The commentary isn't even uncivil unless one is touchy about "Please use the talk page? As if he had?" –Pomte 06:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per above Bobby fletcher (talk) 07:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. How can diffs of someone's own comments be an attack on them? WaltonOne 11:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I've argued for deletion of evidence pages in the past, but those were cases when the issue had been resolved long ago or wasn't going to arbcom. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 17:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Page of diffs collected as evidence for an ArbCom case. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 20:16, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.