Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Mbz1/"Mbz01 is the user looking at sanctions"




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  keep. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 13:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Mbz1/"Mbz01 is the user looking at sanctions"
Attack page with no pending RFC. —  Dæ dαlus Contribs 07:24, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Defer until resolution of Articles for deletion/Robert Kennedy in Palestine (1948). There is a problem.  Stop.  Breath.  Take things one step at a time.  We have passionate editors.  This is good.  At least one is upset.  OK, let's work through it.  First thing on the table is the mainspace article, Robert Kennedy in Palestine (1948).  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:08, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with SmokeyJoe. In the medium term, I think it would be best for this page to go, but it may serve a purpose at this stage, and deleting it now might simply fan the flames. I do not see it as an attack page, but a recounting of the significant events in a conflict from one participant's perspective. I seem to be somewhat involved in the conflict, so I offer my views for whatever they are worth. --Avenue (talk) 10:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * User has blanked the page.   "(deleted page from my own user space. which is not link from anywhere.please complain about that at the board of your choice, but do not reinstall it.)"  Looks like an implied WP:CSD.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:11, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Apparently not; removed speedy tag and reinstated mfd, procedural  Chzz  ►  12:49, 19 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep as edited. Prior edit appears to be timely accumulation of material for WP processes, hence would be specific protected usage of userspace.   Collect (talk) 13:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep There's no attack neither in the history nor in the current version. It is my user space. It is not link to/from anywhere. Nominating it for deletion is just ongoing harassment by Daedalus969, which was noticed by two administrators: ; . Please also see here: The only thing I want it is to stay away from that user as much as possible.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Lists of perceived flaws are prohibited.—  Dæ dαlus Contribs 18:54, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Not if they will be used soon during dispute resolution. This list related to an ongoing dispute, and not just between you and Mbz1. --Avenue (talk) 22:16, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, you are correct that such lists can be used for dispute resolution, however, there is nothing on this page that suggests such will happen. No pending RFC, just a list, a list that is not linked to, or used, anywhere, and as such, such lists are prohibited.  If Mb files an RFC in a timely manner, or an ANI thread, in a timely manner, then it may stay, otherwise no.—  Dæ  dαlus Contribs 22:19, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree, but there is not good reason to rush, and with the page blanked, there's not much to complain about immediately. The article is about to be deleted.  This will peter out soon enough.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:39, 20 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Close (without prejudice). I think the a result of Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents is that Mbz1 (the author) and Daedalus969 (the nom) are temporarily banned from interacting.  Articles for deletion/Robert Kennedy in Palestine (1948) has closed as "no consensus", largely due to significant continued editing.  There is little benefit in this drama today.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:49, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep for now. No need to rush, or appear to harass. SPhilbrick  T  20:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.