Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:My21cents (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep. User has ceased using the page inappropriately. If the user restarts, they may be blocked.--Aervanath (talk) 18:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

User talk:My21cents
(Second nom. See this for previous discussion).

User still keeps using the talk page as a copy of an article. Refer to previous nom for valid arguments. See this for page history where a warning has already been given. Xeltran (talk) 09:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:UP BigDunc  Talk 09:42, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Blank and warn user sanction from previous MfD just needs to be applied again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:07, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Sanction from the previous MfD was not applied. I have removed the copied material and asked  the user a question.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as edited by SmokeyJoe. If the user persists in posting a copy of an article on their user talk page, without providing a good explanation why they are doing so, block the user. Deleting the page would be counterproductive as that would delete all the warnings that have been issued to the user. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:51, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I have changed due to the reasoning of Metropolitan90 as deletion would in fact remove all warnings given to this user, block the user and blank the page is the best option IMO. BigDunc  Talk 10:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Blank, and block user if he continues to restore it. Deleting the talk page would be counterproductive. Stifle (talk) 11:21, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and strongly suggest the user use a Sandbox page for this, and explain the rationale for a "talk" page being primarily for talk. Blocking an editor for having a copy of an article he is actively working on seems a bit odd. Collect (talk) 20:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Archive it and blank. Then block the user. Junk Police (talk) 02:17, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.