Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Newman Luke/Editnotice




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.

User talk:Newman Luke/Editnotice
Editnotice visible by all intended to disparage another wiki editor. If Newman Luke has an issue with IZAK, the place for that is either of their respective talkpages or WP:RFC. Creating an edit notice seen by everyone who is going to edit Newman's pages may be construed as harrassment at worst, and very poor judgment at best. --Avi (talk) 15:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Avi. If Luke has an issue with IZAK, an editnotice is not the place to express it. @Kate   (talk)  20:39, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Avi's well-articulated arguments. This is definitely not an acceptable use of the user talk namespace. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 21:42, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Quite straightforward. This is clearly not acceptable regardless of the circumstances. Tim Song (talk) 05:14, 6 December 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.