Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Paularblaster

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  procedural close, already deleted. Avic ennasis @ 14:29, 21 Kislev 5777 / 14:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Occasional releases of personal information on this user talk page have resulted in personal harassment of the user. Oversighting is impractical. Deletion of the page is requested under Right_to_vanish Fred Talk 16:14, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete As an oversighter, I assume you know when it is practical or not to oversight a page! I'd suggested oversighting to the user, as this would mean that only other oversighters (41 at the moment) could see the page, as opposed to the 1703 admins if it is deleted. If this is not practical, then deletion is the best option, so I fully support it. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 16:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment As an oversighter and an admin, I am surprised that you didn't just delete the page (as an CSD U1 deletion) if you don't believe that oversighting is relevant. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 18:05, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I've done so, but it is somewhat out of process. Fred Talk 18:16, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm assuming that you mean the fact that user talk pages aren't often deleted? I'd agree, but feel that you have made the right call here! I'll leave it for you to close this MfD. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 18:56, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.