Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Phoenix and Winslow/Xenophrenic

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. BencherliteTalk 17:34, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

User talk:Phoenix and Winslow/Xenophrenic


Per WP:UP, user pages that are for the "recording of perceived flaws" should not be kept indefinitely. This page was created one month ago but it was not used swiftly for dispute resolution purposes, as required. There is no other page linked to this user page, showing that it has never been disclosed, let alone that it has not been "used in a timely manner." Binksternet (talk) 21:20, 5 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Note that User:Xenophrenic is now notified of this discussion as he is the target of the "recording of perceived flaws." Binksternet (talk) 21:22, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

The page is linked in dispute resolution at the Evidence page for the ArbCom proceeding. Linked in green boldface, in the first sentence of the third paragraph here. That proceeding is still pending. Binksternet is well aware that Xenophrenic is the subject of dispute resolution, and since he's on the same side as Xenophrenic in the content dispute at Tea Party movement, and I'm on the opposite side, one can only wonder whether this is an attempt at WP:WIKILAWYERing by Binksternet. Delete the evidence before ArbCom can make a final ruling on it? That's an interesting tactic. Accordingly, this MfD should be swiftly deleted and perhaps Binksternet should consider carefully what he's doing here. Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 21:42, 5 August 2013 (UTC)


 * I disagree with Xenophrenic on a regular basis, so that red herring has nothing to do with this case. The reason I filed this Mfd was because the "what links here" button returned nothing at all when I first looked. I am now seeing that you linked to this page at ArbCom through the use of the full URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Phoenix_and_Winslow/Xenophrenic rather than by wikilink, which is probably why "what links here" came up empty. Binksternet (talk) 22:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per P&W's URL link to ArbCom. Binksternet (talk) 22:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep....currently used as a linked page from an open arbitration case.--MONGO 02:59, 6 August 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.