Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:RuleOfThe9th




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  keep. --Killiondude

User talk:RuleOfThe9th
(talk) 04:01, 11 October 2009 (UTC) User is leaving WP --BoeingRuleOfThe9th-700 (talk) 04:40, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Userpages are not routinely deleted, for a wide variety of reasons. If you wish to leave, just log out and don't log in again. → ROUX   ₪  04:45, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Prior edits state that xe is not in fact leaving, but switching to . Uncle G (talk) 12:25, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - User talk pages are not deleted aside from in exceptional circumstances. — neuro  14:27, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - as the above editors have said, talk pages are not deleted - and this one is blank anyway. --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 19:56, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per neuro. The only reason that I can think of that a user talk page would be deleted would be if there were personal identifiable information. Simply leaving the encyclopedia is the reason that we have the retired tag. –Katerenka  (talk • contribs) 20:00, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment as curiosity with the above comment from Uncle G, why didn't this user go through a user rename process? I'd redirect the user space to the new username.  Zoo Fari  21:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The user just failed an RfA by a long margin, perhaps they are switching accounts to not be recognised as such, and they didn't want it showing up in the log. — neuro  14:06, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Except, now there's this MfD tying the accounts together for all posterity. Should we MfD this MfD after it closes?  This plan seems poorly thought out. Gigs (talk) 18:45, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * A poorly thought out plan is still a plan ;) — neuro  21:34, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * has a userbox on his userpage that ties the two accounts together. An MfD of this MfD will be unnecessary. Warmly, –Katerenka  (talk • contribs) 21:53, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * It is to be notified that I, once known as RuleOfThe9th, the user you guys were talking about, expect that this page is to be deleted, as no discussion will be posted on the talk page.--7107delicious (talk) 12:26, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Extrapolating what I can from your difficult to read comment, user talk pages are not deleted just because you changed names and "no discussion will be posted on the talk page". Put retired at the top, redirect it to your current talk page, or just leave it blank, but it doesn't merit being deleted. –Katerenka  (talk • contribs) 18:05, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Is this what you call WP:SOCK, Neuro?--7107delicious (talk) 12:31, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Excuse me? — neuro  19:30, 7 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per precent on talk pages. -- B figura (talk) 05:17, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.