Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:S57bnd

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. Salvio Let's talk about it! 17:12, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

User talk:S57bnd


Both of this users pages, probably created by the same person, were deleted per MfD:User:Nikkolson and MfD:User:S57bnd as WP:FAKEARTICLE pages. All images by User:Nikkolson have also been deleted. I would think the talk pages created just to notify the users that his images/User talk should also be deleted, since this user has no contributions anymore. However, I'm, new at the MfD process. If I'm wrong please let me know and I will withdraw this Mfd request.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 19:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep both. I see no good reason to delete either of these user talk pages. Both of them contain notices to the user about other pages/files they contributed which were deleted. If these user talk pages get deleted, that means that the user will no longer be able to see the notices to them that explain how those pages/files got deleted. But we do want the user to have access to those notices. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 08:16, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, we do not delete talk pages without very good reason, which the nomination does not supply. Talk pages are kept as a record of interactions, especially warnings.  Deleted talk pages makes it hard for non-admins to track behaviour of troublesome editors.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:51, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.