Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Sandbox for user warnings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Speedy keep per WP:SNOW. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 20:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Sandbox for user warnings
Just sandbox over pouring. User:Yousaf465 03:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - The regular sandbox shouldn't be used for warning templates per WP:BITE. Additionally, having a sandbox in the User talk: namespace allows for testing tools which will only work in that namespace, such as Twinkle. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:44, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It was just used for sandboxing mot for deleteing .User:Yousaf465


 * Strong speedy keep - suggest close per WP:CLUE. // roux   07:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong speedy keep per above
 * Strong speedy keep. This user and user page exist to stop people from misusing User:Example as a testing ground. It isn't "spillover" at all. — Gavia immer (talk) 18:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.