Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Smelly Milleno Pan

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:49, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

User talk:GaleWhirlwind


An attack username, obviously trying to impersonate someone who Achmednut 321 does not like; cyberbullying page. VegetaSaiyan (talk) 23:30, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose Per WP:DELTALK, User Talk pages are generally not deleted. It is not standard practice to delete user talk pages of users blocked for attack usernames, and there doesn't appear to be a compelling reason to do so here. Monty  845  23:44, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment the user has been identified as a sock puppet. Do we usually delete in these cases? -- Klein zach  01:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * We don't usually delete talk pages. The deletion of sockpuppet accounts I think is best left to the discretion of the checkusers and their admin clerks (we don't want to populate MfD with records of sockpuppet accounts per WP:DENY).  Redirect to User:Achmednut321 or delete per WP:CSD.  "Attack" pages should only be brought to MfD if the speedy is declined, as the nomination perpetuates the attack.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:20, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, this is a typical sockpuppet talk page, so we preserve it. Nyttend (talk) 13:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, nothing out of the norm here. --MrRadioGuy P T C E 14:06, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.