Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Sro23 is banned like a poop 2016-2020

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Speedied. The attack username causes any pagename containing it to present as an attack page. There is no reason to retain such a page where the only content is the block notice. The fact that User:Sro23 is being a good sport about things does not change the result. Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:53, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

User talk:Sro23 is banned like a poop 2016-2020


Page was created by admin with a blocking template only. Account is permanently blocked. This probably should be deleted per WP:DENY. Safiel (talk) 03:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * An account created today that has no edits, and no deleted edits? A discretion and WP:DENY failure by User:BU Rob13, in blocking, and in creating the talk page, and then in Safiel broadcasting the matter at MfD.  Accounts that are not editing should not be -pre-emptively blocked. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:19, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The account did edit, although those edits will no longer appear to non-admins in the account's contributions. The block was not preemptive, although I'll note that it would certainly be justified as such based on the username, which refers to . I have no objection to the user talk page being deleted if the community prefers to go that route, although I'm not personally a fan of that practice when we haven't tied the account to a specific long-term sockmaster. The edits did not make the sockmaster immediately obvious. ~ Rob 13 Talk 04:51, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I took a further look, and it appears the sockmaster may be . ~ Rob 13 Talk 04:52, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks Rob. I guess I am mistaken to trust the deleted edits count in tool like this?
 * I think the best thing to do is to defer to the judgement of the blocking admin. I suggest redirecting, both userpage and talk page, to the sockmaster.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * : Special:CentralAuth gives an accurate count of deleted edits. Rebb  ing  21:45, 27 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I have no problem with letting the talk page stay, I say why not keep it. I don't think it's a sock of SGK, Tikeem or whatever, it's probably Nikolas.Sudarpo, so no need for WP:DENY in this case. Sro23 (talk) 14:41, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.