Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Stavarflorin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep page, remove spam. &mdash;harej (talk) (cool!) 21:14, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Stavarflorin
Page used for advertising and/or spam, for a construction company --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 11:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Spam with no bluelinks is not really effective -- and this is a usertalk page in any case -- not even indexed by Google, so using it for spam is singularly ineffective.  No real need to delete -- ego Keep. Collect (talk) 12:41, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Just blank out the spamming  Triplestop  x3  16:24, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Eventually user talk is used for something. Just blank spam. GrooveDog (talk) (Review) 17:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Be bold and delete out anything that doesn't belong as per WP:UP, and chastise the user if they insist on re-inserting it. There's no need to delete the entire page. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 12:45, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Blank offending parts, Keep the rest I don't think WP:NOHARM is a very persuasive argument to keep trash around, even in non-indexed user_talk space. Gigs (talk) 15:10, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.