Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow/Vandalism & Harassment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  12:38, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

User talk:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow/Vandalism & Harassment
This page is mainly critical and defamatory of me, and the user T-man was indefinitely banned from wikipedia months ago. I don't see why it should remain here. Dyslexic agnostic 05:09, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, and be happy that the guy is banned so I can't go further. This isn't really critical and defamatory, it definitely is not such of you specifically, and thus, this should be kept, if only to see something you really shouldn't do. -Amarkov blahedits 05:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete There's really no value to keeping it, and I can see the harm if someone else sees it and thinks that such record keeping is a good idea. (sometimes it can be, but sometimes it simply encourages conflict) Not sure who else other than T-man would use this page, and he's indefinitely banned. If people do have a dispute where they need to do such record keeping then they should be encouraged to save the data to a local file, rather than making a soapbox out of their user space. -- Ned Scott 05:31, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - contains numerous negative comments about other editors and serves no useful purpose with the creator banned indefinitely. If the creator needs the information for a legitimate reason at some point (e.g. to appeal for lifting of the block), the creator can ask an admin to provide a copy offline. Newyorkbrad 21:12, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the comments above. Not useful and a boarderline attack page.  Eluchil404 02:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all. Xiner (talk, email) 04:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as an attack page, and it seems to be directed only at User:Dyslexic agnostic. James086Talk 05:27, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment please also see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:T-man/Example of a type of DA harassment. James086Talk 05:27, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as someone who was witness to this mess when it first happened, this was contentious behavior to begin with, was removed from the user's userspace already, and I'm surprised this subpage was not deleted as well. ~CS 03:34, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NPA. IgorSF 10:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.