Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Thehelpinghand/draft for social populism

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete, with the caveat that if Thehelpinghand is subsequently unblocked and wishes to resume work on this particular draft (as opposed to creating a new copy of the then-current version of the article), they can request undeletion from any administrator or at WP:DRV. --RL0919 (talk) 02:16, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Thehelpinghand/draft for social populism
Another abandoned draft article by this user. No real substantive changes from Social populism, the article this is a copy of. No edits at all in the full month before this user was blocked. Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:37, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. A fake article. Not much more to say.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 20:02, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE, which states "While userpages and subpages can be used as a development ground for generating new content, this space is not intended to indefinitely archive your preferred version of disputed or previously deleted content or indefinitely archive permanent content that is meant to be part of the encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a free web host and private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion" (mine emphasized). Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 23:23, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Hardly surprising it isn't being edited, if the main editor is blocked. I don't know enough about the block to know whether it can be successfully appealed. I'd prefer to wait six months after editor returns (with no further activity), or, if they never return, go at least a year until removal. -- SPhilbrick  T  16:49, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE; not helpful. I read User talk:Thehelpinghand and I do not think it is worth waiting to see if the editor understands the advice given and takes suitable action to have the block removed. Johnuniq (talk) 08:05, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.