Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:WLU/RFC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Keep. Vexatious, bad faith nomination. --Smashvilletalk 01:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

User talk:WLU/RFC‎
Only recently was I made aware of the existence of this page; none of the participating users bothered to inform me. I find this page offensive and disruptive, and since WLU has declared not to start any kind of procedure based on these collected allegations, there is no reason for it to exist on Wikipedia. Guido den Broeder (talk, visit) 22:06, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note The start of this collection was on December 11, 2008. Guido den Broeder (talk, visit) 22:29, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - Users are explicitly permitted to draft RfCs in userspace, with the implied understanding that said RFC needs to be filed in a reasonable amount of time. It's only been there for three days. If it still exists in a couple of weeks with no action, I would absolutely support deletion at that time. // roux   22:15, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll try, but I am going through 4K worth of contribs starting from the beginning; it's been pasted to a divbox on my talk page so I always have reference to the actual diffs and sections, but if it is there too long it makes sense to draft it off-wiki. Naturally, every post like this one delays my ability to finish it.  WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 22:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep in agreement with roux. Give the author time to finish what he's working on. Crystal whacker (talk) 00:14, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * User has declared that it won't go to RFC but instead "it's there in case I need it". Guido den Broeder (talk, visit) 00:20, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Selective quoting doesn't help your position. The full statement was "When/if I move it into AN, I'll alert Guido of this, as well as other editors who are interested, to its existence for comment. Right now it's there in case I need it." // roux   00:26, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Now that's selective quoting. You leave out the part where he says not to start a RFC. To support anything on AN/I, this page is overkill. Guido den Broeder (talk, visit) 00:29, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep This is clearly vexatious litigation on Guido's part, and indicative of the reasons the RFC is being drafted in the first place. Still, I urge WLU to finish and formalize the RFC in due course.  Skinwalker (talk) 01:17, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.