Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Waandjavictoria

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Withdrawn by Nominator. Valid concerns, leading to page modification and withdrawal of nomination (non-admin closure) 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:39, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

User talk:Waandjavictoria

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Seems like an essay. —asparagusus  (interaction)  sprouts!  02:18, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator per User:Pawnkingthree. —asparagusus   (interaction)  sprouts!  23:44, 11 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete as a violation of WP:UPNOT and WP:NOTHERE. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 13:23, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep as most of the offending content has now been removed by the user. Seems to be functioning as a regular user talk page now. Pawnkingthree (talk) 23:25, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - But a question. Should user talk pages that are essays or fake articles be deleted, or should the content be blanked, and in exceptional cases redacted?  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Dealt with. Curbon7 (talk) 06:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.