Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:A few terms about pageviews

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  userfy to User:NikosLikomitros/A few terms about pageviews. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:A few terms about pageviews

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Not sure how useful this page is even as an essay. Seems this should probably be userfied in the event the editor who created this page wants to edit it more ... otherwise, its value as a project page is quite questionable in the page's current state. Steel1943 (talk) 14:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Information that may be useful for quantitative program management should be retained, even if the utility isn't immediately obvious. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:02, 29 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep MFD reasoning does not warrant deletion.  thetechie@enwiki  :  ~/talk/  $  00:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete or userfy (second preference). The information is false. The claims are not sustained by evidence and the "examples" in the form of stat pages which are linked fail to corroborate. There are certain oscillations but their quality and level of regularity does not correspond to what is stated on the page. Pages with false empirical claims abut Wikipedia are not suitable content for project space. In addition to this, and separately from it, it is not clear that the content is about the English Wikipedia. In fact, it seems specifically not to be about the English Wikipedia but about several other language versions of Wikipedia (looking at English Wikipedia pageviews there is even less of a correspondence, that is, zero correspondence). This is another reason why the content is not suitable for project space. —Alalch E. 00:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete or userfy per above, this doesn't even appear to be related to the English Wikipedia. While some of our readers are indeed from the Indian subcontinent, claims that our pageviews increase by 30% during the monsoon season are plainly false for en.wiki, and appear to be relevant for other Wikipedia editions at best. Chaotic Enby   (talk · contribs) 07:56, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Userify: Work-in-progress with little-to-no value in projectspace but which is within the purview of WP:UPYES. Curbon7 (talk) 06:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * As an addendum, and the creator can correct me if I am wrong here, I imagine the creator was analyzing pageviews through Indic-language Wikipedias as a proxy for analyzing en.wp traffic from the subcontinent (perhaps because they didn't know of the "Pageviews by country" function). Curbon7 (talk) 07:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.