Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (3rd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Joke's over (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 11:52, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Frankly, I can't think of a good reason to have the thing. Vaticidalprophet 00:05, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Where else am I going to get my Wikipedia drama? ◢  Ganbaruby!   (Say hi!) 00:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete in order to crash the servers by deleting a page with so many revisions. —  csc -1 00:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * nope * Pppery * it has begun... 00:33, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * In that case, histmerge and selective undelete so random articles can be enhanced by having random revisions of ANI in their history. —  csc -1 01:17, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I'd quite like some bits-o-ANI in my user talk page. Vaticidalprophet 01:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Move to WP:Drama board. Much better/more accurate name. — python coder (talk &#124; contribs) 00:31, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Keeping Up With The Kardashians is ending soon, and I need my source of drama. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 00:36, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge with Drama. JJPMas ter 01:19, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * JJPMas ter 01:19, 1 April 2021 (UTC) Panini 📚 03:12, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Disruptive incidents are clearly a bad thing. Without this noticeboard, they won't exist, which would clearly be better. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 03:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete/Merge it's a hostile environment. Discussions can lead to bans and blocks without the issue being resolved. The behaviour there is no better than what's being reported in many cases. Unfortunately it's unlikely to be deleted as this discussion has been put in the April Fools section. Although it does mean that the reasons to keep are all nonsense. I agree with the histmerge suggestion; revisions can be merged to unwatched pages. Peter James (talk) 10:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Admins are lame... we need to block all of them so that users can run wild and free. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:59, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment deletion would may be good for Wikipedians, but think of all the server kittens that will have to die for this to happen. 2A03:F80:32:194:71:227:81:1 (talk) 22:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.