Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Alternatives to the "Expand" template

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Keep as historical. — xaosflux  Talk 01:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Alternatives to the "Expand" template


Essay I wrote a long time ago back when expand was still somewhat in use despite being deleted. As the template is now long since a memory of Wikipedia history, I feel there is no longer a need to keep up a page suggesting alternatives. By now, most people don't even remember expand and know what to do in its stead. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:50, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's referenced in a lot of places. Mark as historical? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:47, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Mark as historical per Ricky81682. Graham 87 08:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Mark as historical. I can understand the desire to get rid of it, but it is linked from a number of places and a "historical" note would be less perplexing than a lot of redlinks. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.