Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:April Fools' Day 2021/Requests for adminship/COVID-19

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Speedy deleted (G7) by  (non-admin closure) —  csc -1 01:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:April Fools' Day 2021/Requests for adminship/COVID-19

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Serious deletion nomination. COVID-19 jokes are tasteless and unfunny. They were unofficially banned last year, and I think we should do the same this year. — python coder (talk &#124; contribs) 00:17, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Oh, I didn't realize about the ban. Noah  💬 00:21, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * It wasn't a ban so much as common sense.
 * Delete per nom, this crossed a line. Even if this was an ok joke, no one would be able to comment on it as they would have all had serious conflicts of interest with the "user" in question (this was a joke, but the first sentence I stand by). D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 00:23, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom ThatIPEditor Talk · Contribs 00:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Honestly, I'd be inclined to avoid April Fool's RfAs this year entirely, considering recent events. Vaticidalprophet 00:38, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Nominator comment: Could we please get this closed and resolved in the next few hours/minutes? Thanks — python coder (talk &#124; contribs) 01:07, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.