Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep because I like it – and also because April Fool's is over.‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__  Invading Invader  (userpage, talk) 13:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions


Where do i even begin, this article has so many problems that I dont even know where to begin
 * firstly as the nominatonator I say Delete as per nom
 * since I am the only one who voted so far and I say delete
 * This is unencylopedic
 * There aren't any source in this article so it must not be notable
 * Does not pass WP:GNG
 * No sources so no notability ofc
 * This won the award for the worst wikipedia policy of 2023
 * Not even an actual policy so delete
 * I also dont like it, infact I hate it, its the worst wikipedia policy ever
 * It's not interesting at all obiviously since i dont like it
 * It also adds zero value to this site
 * Very harmful forcing people to do stuff so Delete
 * This article is too funny to a point its actually stupid
 * Besides I don't even get the point of the joke
 * I dont like the format
 * This article is rubbish
 * Only sources are offline
 * Creator hasn't been online in years
 * Its an orphan (i think)
 * Given its a bad policy this article will prob get vandalised
 * Its simply just not notable
 * Delete as a google search reveals that I can only anything about this policy on wikipedia (.ie this article)
 * 18 years old and this article still looks incredibly bad no hope of it existing in the future
 * This isn't a real policy anymore so delete
 * Less than 100 views a day according to page view despite being a policy lame delete it
 * as of right now I am the only voter and I say delete and majority rules
 * Not enough editors (i think)
 * this policy has never appeared in the news or existed anywhere on earth outside wikipedia
 * maybe like 20 people have used this policy before
 * My friends dont know about it so Delete
 * This wikipedia policy is a crystal ball clearly
 * Not once source could i find (other than wikipedia) where this policy is indeed real
 * Delete nobody has ever added sources to this article
 * no interwiki
 * I bet a similar article got deleted I dont know
 * A bunch of other articles in

probably also got deleted therefore it should be deleted NotOrrio (talk) 04:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete this isn't a guideline only a bad essay
 * I dont know, creator is bad I think
 * 4th nomination already people want it deleted
 * Delete if this gets kept i will never come back again
 * This article is an insult to us fellow wikipedians
 * WP:ILIKE is not a valid argument
 * the arguments for keeping do not exist yet
 * Delete as people do not obey this. Toadette  ( April Fools Day! ) 06:02, 1 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Opal&#124;zukor (discuss) 15:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * delete per nom astral ▪️  he/him ▪️ >:3   17:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete because I don't like it.  Invading Invader  (userpage, talk) 22:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.