Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Color symbolism and psychology

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Courcelles 18:00, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Article Incubator/Color symbolism and psychology
This is an article which was discussed in February 2010 at Articles for deletion/Color symbolism and psychology, with the result being "delete". It was moved to the article incubator. In the intervening 7 months no editing has been done, and there is no sign of any intention of returning it to main space. The article incubator is for temporary storage of an article while it is being improved, not for long-term storage as a way of evading deletion. We should respect the consensus reached at AfD and delete it. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:01, 18 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. The only person defending this article went off in a huff after things did not go his way at deletion review. He misinterpreted events as some sort of organised conspiracy against him and hasn't been seen since. Nobody else has shown any interest in this. Separate articles for Color symbolism and Color psychology now exist, although they are not very active and could do with a bit of de-orphaning, so it is most likely that any productive development will take place there instead. If anybody thinks any parts of this are worth saving I suggest merging them into one of those two articles, as appropriate. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:25, 18 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete-No reason to think this will go anywhere, especially given the existence of the articles mentioned above.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 19:13, 18 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete pretty much per DanielRigal & nom; there's really nothing more to add... Salvio  Let's talk 'bout it! 19:46, 18 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete DanielRigal and nom said it all.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 22:37, 18 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete in the spirit of WP:FAKEARTICLE. Abandoned draft. MER-C 02:46, 19 September 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.