Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Dos y Dos (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Move to Dos y Dos per consensus, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:10, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Article Incubator/Dos y Dos


Another item that followed the "wrong path" to incubation. Unless I have missed something this never was a mainspace article, it was moved from userspace to the incubator in 2010. There it sat until it was deleted as a result of an admittedly low-participation MFD a few months ago. then it was recreated a month ago per request of a user. I would argue that an item with this sort of history should only be recreated in the incubator if there is a reasonable chance it can be moved to mainspace and become a "real" article. And at a glance this almost looks like it could, until one sees all the "citation needed" tags and what do not look to my eye like independent reliable sources in the ref section. I therefore suggest this be deleted outright or, failing that, moved to mainspace. The incubator is not supposed to be used for indefinite storage yet this has been a draft in one place or another for nearly four years. While there is no deadline I feel it is time for this to either become an article or be removed from Wikipedia altogether. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:17, 27 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Move to article space - This actually should be Dos y Dos (3rd nomination), since the first listing was at Miscellany for deletion/Group of stale articles from Article Incubator and the second listing was at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Dos y Dos. It also was in main space, but A7 speedy deleted. Unscintillating has worked on the article and there are references. A two-year run children's show likely will have attracted enough attention to meet WP:GNG. Move to article space and list at AfD if needed/desired. -- Jreferee (talk) 07:33, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * move to Dos y Dos. Storing in the incubator forever is useless.  It is more likely to be fixed as an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:26, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.