Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Article Incubator/R. H. Sankhala

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 02:09, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Article Incubator/R. H. Sankhala
This was an article which was deleted on 3 November 2011, as a result of Articles for deletion/R. H. Sankhala. It was then incubated following comments on the talk page of the deleting administrator. The incubated article has not had any significant edits since incubation. This diff shows the full extent of changes from the version that was deleted to now. The last edit to the page was for its incubator status to be changed from "eval" to "start" because it did not pass its eval review. (That edit was on 15 November 2010.) It is clear that this is not on its way to becoming a usable article. Incubation is a temporary measure to enable an article to be worked on, not a long term way of keeping an article which consensus has decided should be deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:59, 19 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment The objecting editor may not be able to edit the page after he was blocked following a sockpuppetry investigation; Sockpuppet investigations/Dashing boy31/Archive. My opinions about the subject, however, are unchanged. delete Catfish Jim   &#38; the soapdish  12:07, 19 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment All the more reason to delete it, if the only person who ever wanted it has been indefinitely blocked, so that there is no question of their ever being able to edit it. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. The incubator is not for indefinite storage of deleted content. MER-C 01:56, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Little hope of anybody reviving this. In any case, no real sign that the subject is notable and the current draft is not good enough to be of much use to anyone. Pichpich (talk) 20:32, 21 April 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.