Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Unfettered

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. BencherliteTalk 21:30, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Article Incubator/Unfettered


This was moved into the incubator in November of last year. There have been no substantive edits in all that time, so incubation appears to have failed in this case. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:21, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * keep in incubator until book comes out FishFingersCustard (talk) 15:23, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * That happened in June with the release of the limited edition, you can now get it as an e-book for ten bucks . It's just that, like so many other items in the incubator, once it was put there nobody ever updated it again. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:42, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * That would be an argument for updating and moving to mainspace and having an AfD. I doubt it's notable, but AfD would be the better place to have that discussion.  DGG ( talk ) 20:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I'd be fine with that as a suitable alternative to permanently "incubating" it. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:54, 22 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - The notable discussion has already taken place. AfD1 consensus looks like delete to me due to lack of in-depth coverage in a source that is both reliable and independent. However, the AfD was closed and the page was moved to the incubator in November 2012. WP:ATD-I requires continuous collaborative editing, but Article Incubator/Unfettered has not received that since being moved from AfD to the incubator. There is no interest in updating the page. Both AfD and incubator failed to turn up enough source material for the article and the standards of AfD (lack of notability) and incubator (lack of continuous collaborative editing) both tell us that it is time to delete the page. -- Jreferee (talk) 07:10, 4 September 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.