Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Fortun(o) Sanchez (Sangiz) Grandee Zambrana

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  no consensus - I don't see a policy-based reason to prefer AfC over userspace or vice versa, so I'm left with a 1:1 headcount. Wily D 07:22, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Articles for creation/Fortun(o) Sanchez (Sangiz) Grandee Zambrana


Articles for creation submission that has been submitted on four separate occasions and declined by four different editors. The author continues to use this page as a place to gather and store multiple disparate sources of questionable value with little hope of ever organizing the information into a viable article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:18, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

The following comment was made on the talk page. I am transcluding it here so the discussion can take place in one venue. I am not done with it

I have found more books and references and even the Library of congress has giving me books that support all i have stated.

Is there anybody with the expertice of heraldry of Pamplona.

I am giving lots of information that support many of your wikis.

Some have even stolen the information as their own.

Can you please forward this to the CEo or the Board of directors to Wikipedia to evaluate.

Also please wait i am sharing this information to Scholars in Spain, France, and England. Using this link.

Jose Luis Zambrano De Santiago (talk)

Jose Luis Zambrano De Santiago (talk) 21:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Itzcoatzin will likely never be done with it. He is collecting random facts from disparate sources all over the internet and just dropping them on to this page as if it were a holding bin.  The page has existed and been in development for three months now, and has been submitted for AFC four times, but it has never improved, despite several editors comments, both on the page and on Itzcoatzin's talk page, about the problems with the page.  He has already made a user space draft of the article.  Let him continue to work on it there to his heart's content, but cluttering up the AFC process with this page is just a waste of other people's time.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Because i only care about people that bring something to the table not the ones that wants to delete history. Expert will point flaws but bring the rigth information. you look for mistakes and typos and want to delete the poject. I am working with scholars on this i use the link to share the info.

Not to mention the fact that many have use my data and have not given me credit for it. All involving the pamplona kingdom and their infantas or princess. HOuse marks are Princess huoseholds. I bet you did not know that, now you know because i told you. You take my information and reasearch and put your name on it.

Jose Luis Zambrano De Santiago (talk)

Jose Luis Zambrano De Santiago (talk) 19:07, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.