Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Callum Baillie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Speedy keep Frivolous MFD. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Callum Baillie
Delete - In clear violation of WP:CSD - Attack page, the page serves no purpose except to disparage its subject -- Ego-defence-mechanic (talk) 13:57, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's an AfD, and there's no serious attacks there; just a claim that the person isn't notable. How is this a G10? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk  ) 14:23, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. It's an ongoing deletion discussion, and as noted, the "attack" seems to be the assertion that the person isn't notable, commonly found in deletion discussions. There's nothing deletable here. — Gavia immer (talk) 16:11, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep It is blatantly obvious that this is not an attack page. Ego-defence-mechanic has ignored my advice to remove this request. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:15, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.