Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Jordan Dorner

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  keep. I'll speedily close this as there isn't a snowball's chance in hell of this article deletion discussion being deleted. AfD discussion pages are retained for the historical record. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Christopher Jordan Dorner


This appears to be a joke. Notability is beyond reason here. Herp Derp (talk) 22:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy close; bad faith nomination. No, it's not a joke. Not to mention that deleting an active deletion discussion is completely unprecendented and a very bad idea.  elektrik SHOOS  (talk) 22:29, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * It should be noted that this user also has an extensive history of bad-faith XfD nominations and was specifically warned against continuing to do so on their talk page.  elektrik SHOOS  (talk) 22:53, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep It's not a joke, it's simply someone who doesn't understand WP:BLP1E. It appears that the matter will be resolved shortly, and will bring more eyes onto the more nuanced question of merge vs. not-merge, I don't see a problem.   --j⚛e deckertalk 22:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - bad faith nomination from an editor with a poor track record at deletion discussions. GiantSnowman 23:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.